Contents
Are Sweeteners Helpful?
A solution for diabetics?
In 2004, the Canadian Diabetes Association published a major review of studies reviewing the use of synthetic sweeteners in the management of diabetes.1. Like more than a hundred countries around the world and the World Health Organization (WHO), the organization believes that these products may be useful for people with diabetes “to limit their consumption of carbohydrates, control their blood sugar and weight and avoid dental caries ”.
“It seems that the daily consumption (up to the acceptable daily intake) of aspartame, sucralose, saccharin, cyclamate […] has no significant effect on blood sugar or lipids. blood in people with diabetes ”, we can read in this summary.
“These products are useful, yes, but that does not mean that we should consume them, it remains a very personal choice”, specifies Isabelle Galibois, professor of nutrition at Laval University and specialist in diabetes. She recalls that many diabetics, contrary to popular belief, can indeed consume a certain dose of “ordinary” sugar.
In fact, starches would affect blood sugar much more than added sugar. In other words, the diabetic, if they have to avoid mashed potatoes, can usually afford a little sugar in their coffee.
Are synthetic sweeteners useful for diabetics? Useful, without being necessary.
Trick the brain with “fake sugar”?
In 2005, a preliminary search2 carried out at Laval University in Quebec City cast doubt on the usefulness of aspartame in the management of blood sugar in type 2 diabetics. This study investigated the impact of substituting sugar with sugar. aspartame in a single meal, and its subsequent effects on modulating blood sugar levels during exercise.
In other words, we wanted to know if it is better to eat, or not, before making a physical effort. By the same token, we were trying to find out what was the best energy composition of a meal before physical activity.
The participants (type 2 diabetics under medical supervision) performed five exercise sessions, once on an empty stomach and four more times after a meal. The meals were visually identical: only the type of sweetener used differed from meal to meal. However, contrary to the expected results, the rise in blood sugar after ingestion of the “aspartame” meal turned out to be similar to that of the “sugar” meal! How to explain it?
Nutritionist Annie Ferland, co-author of the research, hypothesizes that “we trick the brain ”by mimicking the taste of sugar. The simple act of “tasting” the sugar, even if aspartame is low in calories, may be enough to trigger the glycemic response associated with “real” sugar. However, has science not demonstrated the effectiveness of sweeteners in this matter?
“Many studies have been carried out on the safety of sweeteners, but few have focused on the glycemic response,” says the researcher. Their use has been validated for long-term management of diabetes, but little is known about their impact after acute intake, ”explains Annie Ferland.
“That doesn’t mean it’s dangerous !, insists the researcher. The problem is, people with diabetes simply don’t know it, and it’s something they should be aware of when managing their blood sugar. “.
|
… And for those who want to lose weight?
The Canadian Diabetes Association expert group that summarized the studies suggests that sweeteners may be helpful in weight loss programs. “Current data indicates that the consumption of synthetic sweeteners, added to multidisciplinary programs, can accelerate weight loss and improve weight control in obese people,” he says.
Note the key phrase: “multidisciplinary program”. The few studies done on this subject – not all of which have been published in scientific journals – have evaluated the effectiveness of sweeteners as part of a more comprehensive program, that is, one that includes a restrictive diet. and an increase in energy expenditure (more exercise!)3,4,5.
To lose weight, isn’t it enough to eat better and move more? “Of course, population surveys do not show that people who consume sucralose are thinner than people who do not consume it! We don’t make a diet with aspartame or sucralose, but we can use them as tools, ”says Isabelle Galibois, specialist in diabetes.
Hélène Baribeau, nutritionist, occasionally uses certain sweetened products as “tools” in the context of her private practice, in particular with a clientele of women in their fifties who have already made a significant reduction in calories. “You have to go on a case-by-case basis and ask yourself where this person is coming from,” she explains. If it is someone who ate a lot of sugar, you can, as a first step, reduce your sugar intake with the help of substitutes. But, at the same time, we must encourage him to eat less sugary foods. You have to do both, not replace one with the other. “
This is why the nutritionist only recommends sweetened products that offer nutritional value and therefore promote the adoption of healthy eating habits. “I’m thinking of yogurts, especially, and some rice and tapioca puddings, which contain calcium, vitamin D and protein. Even though there is a little sucralose, I consider them to be relatively healthy products. It’s not about replacing a piece of cake … with a piece of Splenda cake! », Says Hélène Baribeau.
Two weights, two measures?
Some websites promote synthetic sweeteners by encouraging consumers to maintain unhealthy eating habits. One of them even offers a weight loss diet that allows the consumption of chips… thanks to the use of this substitute. The calculation is simple: by replacing the “real” sugar with a sweetener, we reduce the daily calorie intake, which leaves room to eat chips!
Do sweeteners lead to the adoption of good eating habits or do they only serve the status quo, or even cheating?
The Canadian Diabetes Association, in its study report, recognizes this risk. “Synthetic sweeteners are more profitable when used to replace foods with high energy and low nutritional value, including sucrose (Editor’s note: sugar), and less profitable when used to replace foods. foods with high nutritional value such as milk, fruit and fruit juices. “
“If the substitute encourages you to eat foods that take the place of healthy foods, then there is a problem!” Exclaims Hélène Baribeau.
Another problem is that the sweetener can perpetuate the habit of consistently eating large portions of cakes, cookies or other floury desserts after a meal. At best, the person will not have changed their eating habits. At worst, it will enter the vicious circle of compensation.
“Sweetened products never taste like the original version. We want a real chocolate cake, but we have a little aspartame cookie. At some point you take it, your real chocolate cake. And you take twice as much! I prefer that people take the original version once in a while, rather than seeking compensation through all these products, ”slices the nutritionist.
The taste of sugar The basic question, which animates many discussions between nutritionists from different horizons, is that of the taste of sugar. The “real” problem raised by the use of sweeteners would therefore not be one of safety or effectiveness in controlling blood sugar or weight. But it would rather be linked to the fact that the latter cultivate the taste of sugar. “The human being is physiologically programmed to go towards a sweet taste. Can we suppress this need, this innate taste? Maybe, but I’m not sure about that. I think sweeteners can offer good options for people who otherwise would have to go without this sweet taste, especially type 1 diabetics. “ Isabelle Galibois“We have plenty of taste buds to detect sugar. It’s not scientifically proven, but according to Orientals, it’s important that you taste a little sweet, salty, bitter and sour in a meal. If your meal is rather salty, it’s normal that afterwards, you want your little sweet touch. If it’s a small amount, that’s okay. The goal is not to cut sugar completely. “ Helene Baribeau |